On the Evolution of Slavery

On the Evolution of Slavery
I’ve been musing about this. I tried google but no one appears to have considered how the institution actually evolved.
I have a few ideas, sparked not so much by slavery as by working out the plot for my trilogy, Darwin’s World.
I came up with a few things, the first being this:
Good ideas, taken too far, aren’t.
The corollary to this is obvious: All bad ideas began as good ideas.
So how did slavery evolve and how did it morph from a good thing to an evil thing?
Consider warfare. In the stone age/bronze age, warfare became an organized thing. Armies were small, ad hoc collections, but they had a ‘general’ and changed from an individual versus individual combat to a group versus group endeavor. The latter were fought for economic rather than personal reasons, although individual combat may have been fought for economic reasons too. But rarely are ‘wars’ fought for such things as possession of a woman, Troy being possibly an exception.
So wars are fought over possession of lands, trading routes, mines, whatever; economics. Later they were fought because of religion, but both types had things in common. And religion was associated with slavery in almost all cases.  Slaves taken by an Islamic kingdom might escape slavery by becoming Muslim, and later Christian priests enslaved the Native Americans and used their labor to enrich the Church.
When individual combats became group combat, what do you do with those you’ve defeated? Especially with primitive weapons, there are likely to be more survivors than corpses.
If you kill them all, they’ll soon realize this and fight to the end rather than surrender. The victorious side takes more casualties.
But if you capture your enemies, keep them as slaves, you’ve turned a liability into an asset.
What to do with them after that?
Rome, Greece, and the Native-American Apaches incorporated their captives into their own society. Not always, of course; late in the respective periods when this process was the norm, economics had begun to be a greater factor. In primitive times, a society/tribe could adopt the captives and thereby replace losses. Later, victorious generals used captives, sold as slaves, to enrich themselves.
Slavery morphed from a solution to what should be done with captives to something that supported a leisure class. Africans captured other Africans and sold them as slaves. Those are the slaves we’ve come to understand, economic property. But there are other forms of slavery.
Some of those forms are permitted, even celebrated, today. Still, at bottom, they’re slavery, suitably modified for public approval.
An early form of slavery was the indentured servant. Another form was the apprentice. In each of these, an individual ‘sold’ himself or was sold by someone with the power to do so, a parent or guardian perhaps. In each case, the ‘slavery’ was for a specified length of time and was done in exchange for something of value, perhaps sea transport to North America or transferring of skills from a master artisan to the apprentice.
So in what form is slavery still practiced and even celebrated?
Consider military service. Are servicepeople not ‘bound’ by oath? Are they not subjected to severe penalties, including execution, for ‘disobedience’? Are they not ‘loaned’ to other ‘masters’ in order that the original holder of their bond profit? Consider some of those loans; Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, drug assistance to nations of South America. Can they not be ‘enslaved’ via conscription? Is this practice different from the ancient British press gang for impressment of unwilling men to serve on board ships?
Extend this practice to the civilian world: what is Walmart other than a cheap slaver?
At least Ol Massa fed, clothed, and housed his slaves. Walmart depends on government assistance for those things. Housing subsidies, SNAP (food stamps), these are how minimum wage employees must supplement what Walmart pays. Or in the case of McDonald’s, another cheap slaver, they’re expected to work two or three of those part-time, minimum-wage jobs if they want to have an independent existence.
And what of health care? Ol Massa kept his slaves healthy, minimum wage slavers demand the government do it or that people go without health care.
Cheap slavers…
One of the good ideas I mentioned above that morphed into a bad idea is capitalism.
Remember that leisure class I mentioned above? We’ve got it, in spades. Consider the salaries paid to Walmart’s ‘associates’ and then compare that with what the company CEO ‘earns’. That salary is measured in the millions and it’s thousands of times more than an ‘associate’ earns. And as for the Walton family, they need only show up to meetings of the Board of Directors, if that. And they now own more than half of America. Listen closely and you’ll hear the ghostly rattle of chains.
Leisure class indeed…

Advertisements

2 Responses to “On the Evolution of Slavery”

  1. lenbilen Says:

    You are picking the wrong target. Walmart typically accepts 3% of the applicants for a job. The government is a real hindrance in job creation by crony capitalism where a few influential people steer regulation to protect their investment, then make a contribution to the party in power. This is much worse in socialist economies, look at Cuba and other failed states. Obama is on the hook from the banks and his friends. You may enjoy my thoughts on slavery:
    http://lenbilen.com/2012/01/26/obama-on-slavery-the-real-source-of-the-curse-of-ham/

    • jlknapp505 Says:

      I don’t agree, but I’ve approved your comment. I’m all for discussion and disagreement is part of that.
      How is the government a hindrance, other than by applying rules/regulations that capitalist entities won’t do for themselves?
      Your comment doesn’t take into account that economic entities are for-profit, always. If there’s no profit they won’t do it, nor should we expect them to. Non-profit activities are for governments to do, things like develop the internet (before capitalism exploited it), the space program, highways, railways, so many other things.
      Consider mining; we’ve seen repeated instances of mining companies that take the profit and abandon the mess behind. They’re still doing it. Ditto spills; or would you believe that Exxon would clean up after the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, or BP after the Gulf Coast spill? How about pipeline ruptures? Railroad or plant explosions, such as in Texas?
      If you believe industry will self-regulate, show me just one instance that this has happened absent government/public pressure.
      Failed states? Mexico perhaps, the drug cartels are nearly as strong as the government. Ditto Columbia, a few other places. But Cuba still is governed by the same people, the same structure, that they put in after their revolution. No failure there. They’ve changed, sure, but they’re still in power allowing the change to occur.
      As for the article, I don’t want to get into an argument; those are MY thoughts on slavery, never meant to be anything else. I developed them because I intended to include this as part of the plot of a book I was writing. Given a new, unpopulated world with no laws other than what people could enforce themselves, would slavery arise? And if so, why? Still, slavery was historic before North America was ever discovered by Europeans. Greeks had it, Romans had it, Egyptians had it (including the Israelites, such as Moses); American natives had it. If the forms were different, I doubt it meant much to the enslaved.
      Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: